Ask not for whom the bell tolls
Well, the US has done it again. Elected an arrogant empty bigoted suit. It didn’t work out for us so well last time. At least this one is smarter. Although that may not be a good thing.
I don’t know what’s happened to the rumor about Krugman and Volcker being in the Cabinet. (Mentioned in my comment to the previous post about “Vote present.”) Now the talk is of Larry Summers. An economist, who obviously flunked any basic bio he might ever have had, who said the following:
“Personally, I believe that there are innate differences between Latino people and non-Latinos, and these innate differences might be one reason fewer Latinos succeed in science and math careers. I also question how much of a role discrimination plays in the dearth of Latino professors in science and engineering at elite universities.”
Except what he really said was “women” instead of “Latinos.” Astonishingly enough, that didn’t make it all right, probably because he had the misfortune to be in that hyper-radical country called Cambridge, Massachusetts. He had to resign his Presidency of Harvard over it. But that’s okay if BO gives him an even huger stage for his bigoted ideas. He’s always made a point of saying he’ll surround himself with good people. Good for what, I’m not sure.
And then there’s Prop. 8 here in California. (Background: the California judiciary recently said it was unconstitutional discrimination to stop same-sex marriages. That led to a ballot initiative so that people could vote to make it illegal again.) It passed, about 52% to 48%. The scuttlebutt has it that what pushed it over the top was new and homophobic Obama voters. The Big 0 himself came out saying marriage was between a man and a woman, a sound bite much used by the vote-yes-on-8 crowd. I’m ignoring the news so I have no idea how this is striking other people, but it breaks my heart. I don’t know why it breaks it so much more when presumed progressives are jerks than when conservatives are, but it does.
And so it goes. He’s already used racism just to score cheap political points. Age-ism is fine, too. So, whoever you are, don’t worry, you won’t be left out. You’ll be paying for this guy’s election unless you’re one of the few from whom he needs something.
Is there any hope? Well, with the economy in the tank, job one is going to be getting that kickstarted. There are two ways to do that. More war, or huge public works projects. I’d say the US is tapped out on the war thing, but you never know. BO talks feelingly of escalating in Afghanistan. However, there is one blindingly obvious public work that has to be done: realigning energy infrastructure away from oil. His ideas are to speed up global warming with coal gasification and to compensate for that by poisoning the planet with nukes. But solar and wind are becoming cheaper so fast that events may overtake his desire to help his paymasters at Exelon. If the current disasters actually push the next Administration into shifting the country toward sustainable energy, it will be worth the awful price. The price only goes up, and if you think it’s expensive to switch now, come back in 10, 20, 30 years.
As for foreign policy, well, it’s hard to see how anyone could be worse than the Shrub-Cheney combo. I’m sure it’s possible, but it is hard. And BO has actually been outside the US. And he’s not stupid. But the only thing he cares about is himself. I shall watch our future progress on this one planet of ours with considerable interest.
(I’m too depressed to look for links. Search for “obama” on this blog, and you’ll find all the references. None of this is new.)
Technorati Tags: Obama, bigotry, energy, homophobia, sexism
You know what breaks my heart? Being a single person and watching married people get benefits not available to me because I do not want to live in a sexual relationship with another person. So I can’t share my employer health care benefits with my niece or get the marriage tax breaks (no Virginia, there is no marriage tax – because if there were the couple would file as single individuals). I cannot share my social security benefits with a friend or relative as a husband can with a wife. And so it goes on for many benefits. The same injustice occurs to childless individuals. This is based on a 6th century idea of what should be demanded from the individual for the good of the social order. It is not good policy or good for the environment to tie benefits to marital status or reproduction. The rewards should be going to those who do not reproduce and who live conservatively as far as demands on the environment. Benefits should be distributed equally between all regardless of marital status – that is prorated between unrelated individuals by contract. Sexual relationships should not confer secular benefits.
So it is not in the interest of single individuals to vote to extend marital benefits to homosexuals. The more of us in the same boat, the more people to vote for a really fair and just society for everyone – where benefits are available equally to married an unmarried people.
The saddest thing about the gay community is how much they wish to join the ranks of the privileged at the expense of all the rest of us.
Greenconsciousness on November 25th, 2008 at 07:17
Being a single person and watching married people get benefits not available to me
Yup. It’s a point I make every chance I get: rights are for all or they’re not rights. They’re privileges.
That said, I can’t agree that gays are seeking a privilege. They’re seeking the same rights everyone else has. The fact that those rights need to be broadened to ALL family-level commitments is something that will happen as they become broader. Not narrower.
So I’d say make your otherwise excellent point by saying, “It’s about damn time we ALL got our rights. Including gays.”
quixote on December 1st, 2008 at 11:12